W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > March 2008

RE: UCR document

From: Boley, Harold <Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:11:46 -0400
Message-ID: <E4D07AB09F5F044299333C8D0FEB45E904FFDEC0@nrccenexb1.nrc.ca>
To: "Adrian Giurca" <giurca@tu-cottbus.de>, "Adrian Paschke" <adrian.paschke@biotec.tu-dresden.de>, "Chris Welty" <cawelty@gmail.com>
Cc: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>

Thanks, Adrian Giurca!

Hi Adrian Paschke and all,

As I mentioned in this Tuesday's telecon, motivating examples
could draw on (updated versions of) the UC "Worked Examples":

http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/D._Evaluation%3A_Use_Cases

Cheers,
Harold


-----Original Message-----
From: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Adrian Giurca
Sent: March 27, 2008 9:14 AM
To: Chris Welty
Cc: Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)
Subject: Re: UCR document


Hi all,

I did a basic demo of interchange with RIF

http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/rewerse-i1/?q=node/64

We will do some others in the near future too.
Some time ago  we implemented the Product Derby Use Case by using R2ML (
http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/userv/ ). I believe that trying
to represent this use case with RIF it might be useful

-Adrian Giurca

Chris Welty wrote:
>
>
> Adrian & RIFWG,
>
> At the last telecon we discussed Gary's UCR review, and I agreed to 
> share my thoughts on where the document should go.  Up until now, the 
> UCR document has provided us a set of requirements, as well as some 
> "design constraints" that have guided our design of BLD.  Going 
> forward, the UCR document will serve as a publicity vehicle for RIF.
> It's purpose is not to guide us anymore, but to guide others to RIF, 
> to explain as simply as possible what RIF dialects are for and why 
> anyone should consider using them.  It should not be a tutorial, 
> focusing on the "Why use RIF"? questions and not "How to use RIF", but

> it should do this with clear motivating examples (i.e. Use Cases) 
> expressed in the syntax&semantics we have developed.
>
> -Chris
>
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2008 14:12:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:47 GMT