W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > March 2008

AW: frozen version of UCR

From: Adrian Paschke <Adrian.Paschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:07:01 +0100
Message-ID: <20080324190701.142920@gmx.net>
To: der@hplb.hpl.hp.com, sandro@w3.org, public-rif-wg@w3.org

Hi Dave,

Yes, you are right. On the other hand, we also can not say that RIF dialects build on RIF Core since we have not specified RIF Core yet. 

So, maybe it is better to remove this paragraph completely. Will do this together with the other updates from the reviews.

Thanks,

Adrian

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Sandro Hawke
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. März 2008 17:59
An: Dave Reynolds
Cc: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Betreff: Re: frozen version of UCR 



> Sandro Hawke wrote:
> > I made the frozen version of UCR:
> > 
> >    http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/draft/ED-rif-ucr-20080318/
> > 
> > I note there's some character set issue.  For me, at least, the word
> > "translation" in the last paragraph is surrounded by characters my
> > browser cannot render. 
> 
> Works for me in Firefox.

Interesting.  What charaters do you see around "translation"?  Some kind
of quotes?

> However, looking at that section it contains a surprising statement:
> 
> "Each RIF dialect will be built upon the general framework for 
> logic-based RIF dialects (RIF-FLD)"
> 
> When did that happen?  I know I've missed some recent telecons and the 
> last couple of f2fs but I've tried to read all the minutes and had 
> thought we still had the notion of a core and that FLD is not itself the 
> core.

Indeed -- that statement is in error.   I'm not sure how it ended up
there.

    -- Sandro

-- 
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört?
Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger
Received on Monday, 24 March 2008 19:07:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:47 GMT