W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > June 2008

Re: SWC at risk

From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 07:50:35 +0200
Message-ID: <4868742B.3030906@inf.unibz.it>
To: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>
CC: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>

There are two editor's notes in the document: the one near the end of 
the overview is pre-last call; it is about an anticipated change in BLD 
before last call.
the second note is in the appendix; it is about what happens with the 
embedding if equality is removed from BLD, since equality is an at-risk 
feature. I think it is appropriate to have this note in the last call 
document, because people may wonder what happens with the embedding if 
equality is removed from BLD.

Best, Jos

Chris Welty wrote:
> 
> 
> When I looked at the document on Friday I saw some editors notes and 
> assumed those were all "at risk" comments.  I see that most have been 
> removed, but not all.  THere should be no editors notes in the last call 
> document.
> 
> _Chris
> 
> Jos de Bruijn wrote:
>> Chris,
>>
>> I'm not sure what you're getting at.  There is one feature at risk [1] 
>> and I use the at-risk style for this.
>>
>> Best, Jos
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/SWC#Safeness_Restrictions
>>
>> Chris Welty wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Jos - please update SWC to use the new "AT RISK" styles.
>>>
>>
> 

-- 
--
Jos de Bruijn            debruijn@inf.unibz.it
+390471016224         http://www.debruijn.net/
----------------------------------------------
If knowledge can create problems, it is not
through ignorance that we can solve them.
   - Isaac Asimov
Received on Monday, 30 June 2008 05:49:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:49 GMT