W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > June 2008

Re: BLD, FLD and DTB: prefix for XML schema namespace

From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:45:46 +0200
Message-ID: <4863654A.2020702@inf.unibz.it>
To: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
CC: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>

I think it's best to follow the convention of the original (XML schema) 
specification, because "xsd" might be a source of confusion (especially 
since there is this deprecated namespace around).
I will not object to xsd, but xs seems to make most sense to me.

Finally, BLD currently uses both in different places in the document; I 
think just one of the two should be used.

Best, Jos

Dave Reynolds wrote:
> 
> Jos de Bruijn wrote:
>>
>> I just noticed the following:
>>
>> The BLD, FLD and DTB documents use "xsd" as a shortcut for the XML 
>> schema namespace. The documents should use "xs" instead.
>>
>> The xsd prefix is conventionally associated with the namespace 
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-datatypes#, which is deprecated.
>> The xs prefix is conventionally associated with the namespace 
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#, which is the one we use.
> 
> I disagree, at least in RDF and OWL "xsd" is the conventional prefix 
> used for "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#". I don't think it matters 
> much either way and don't object to either but see no reason to change 
> the current choice.
> 
> Dave

-- 
Jos de Bruijn            debruijn@inf.unibz.it
+390471016224         http://www.debruijn.net/
----------------------------------------------
Public speaking is the art of diluting a two-
minute idea with a two-hour vocabulary.
   - Evan Esar
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2008 09:44:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:49 GMT