W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > January 2008

Re: named-argument uniterms [was: regrets telecon on Tuesday]

From: Igor Mozetic <igor.mozetic@ijs.si>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:19:27 +0100
Message-ID: <4795A70F.1070403@ijs.si>
CC: RIF <public-rif-wg@w3.org>

After recent email interchanges I realized that named-arg uniterms bring
very little (just possible args reordering, but one has to list them all).
The only argument in favor of keeping them thus remains to have BLD general
(and define various useful profiles).
For my taste the little gain doesn't justify complications, therefore
I am reversing my straw poll vote: I'm in favor of not including them in
BLD but will not object to have them.

Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2008 08:19:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:47:49 UTC