W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > January 2008

RE: [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon January 15

From: Paul Vincent <pvincent@tibco.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:50:52 -0800
Message-ID: <8F4A4531BB49A74387A7C99C7D0B0E050386DD37@NA-PA-VBE02.na.tibco.com>
To: "Christian de Sainte Marie" <csma@ilog.fr>
Cc: "RIF WG" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>

Apologies: I had an action to update the E-Contract Use Case by today;
as I can't make today's call I request the deadline be moved to next
week.

Ciao 
Paul Vincent
TIBCO | ETG/Business Rules 
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of Christian de Sainte Marie
> Sent: 14 January 2008 15:23
> To: RIF WG
> Subject: [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon January 15
> 
> 
> AGENDA Teleconference
> W3C Rules Interchange Format (RIF) Working Group
> 15 January 2008
> 
> North America in the winter time:
> 1600 UTC, 0800 (West US) 1100 (East US) 1600 (London) 1700 (Paris)
> 
> Duration: *90 min*
> 
> *Agenda summary*
> 1. Admin (15 mn)
>   PROPOSED: accept minutes of telecon January 8 [1]
> 2. Liaison (5 mn)
> 3. BLD and Core (70 mn)
>   * Issues 47 (equality) [2]
>   PROPOSED: to close issue 47 without action (i.e. equality stays in
BLD
> as it is currently specified)
>   * Issue 44 (named arguments Uniterm) [3], [4]
>   * Issue 40 (builtins and logic functions) [5], [9]
>   PROPOSED: BLD WD2 will include the builtins listed in [6] (functions
> on numerics), [7] (functions on strings) and [8] (functions on dates
and
> times)
>   * Issue 45 (lists) [10], [11]
> 4. AOB
> 
> [1]
>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Jan/att-0028/rif-
> minutes-jan8-2008.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/issues/47
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/issues/44
> [4]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Jan/0031.html
> [5] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/issues/40
> [6]
>
http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Functions_and_Operators_on_Numerics
?a
> ction=recall&rev=1
> [7]
>
http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Functions_on_Strings?action=recall&
re
> v=1
> [8]
>
http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Functions_and_Operators_on_Dates_an
d_
> Times?action=recall&rev=1
> [9] Thread started by Michael with
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2007Dec/0099.html
> [10] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/issues/45
> [11] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Core/List_Constructor
> 
> -------------------
> 
> *Detailed agenda*
> 
> Bridge: +1.617.761.6200 (US) or +33 4 89 06 34 99 (France)
> Conference code: 74394# ('RIFWG')
> IRC Chat: irc:irc.w3.org (port 6665), #rif
> Web-based IRC (member-only): [http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc]
> 
> *PLEASE POST REGRETS* TO
> [http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/TeleconRegrets]
> 
> Chair: Chris Welty
> Scribe: Gary Hallmark
> See Scribes List [http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/ScribesList]
> 
> Please note that RIF WG telecons are for attendance only by Working
> Group Participants and guests invited by the chairs.
> 
> 1. ADMIN (15 min)
> 
> - Roll call (please read before telecon the following)
> RIF Regrets Policy:
> [http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/RegretsPolicy]
> Using Zakim:
> [http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/UsingZakim]
> Telecon Etiquette:
> [http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/TeleconEtiquette]
> Action/Issues Tracker:
> [http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/]
> 
> - Review actions
> 
> - Agenda amendments
> 
> PROPOSED: accept minutes of telecon January 8 [1]
> 
> - Response to PFPS comments
> 
> 2. Liaison (5 min)
> 
> - Review actions
> 
> - Review active liaisons:
> XQuery, XPath (W3C) - Massimo Marchiori
> Common Logic (ISO) - Bill Andersen & Chris Menzel
> PRR (OMG) - Paul Vincent
> SBVR (OMG) - Donald Chapin
> ODM (OMG) - Elisa Kendall, Evan Wallace
> OWL (W3C) - Sandro Hawke
> 
> 3. BLD (70mn)
> 
> - Review actions
> 
> - Issues 47 (equality) [2]
> 
> PROPOSED: to close issue 47 without action (i.e. equality stays in BLD
> as it is currently specified)
> 
> - Issue 44 (named arguments Uniterm) [3]
> 
>   * Can we conclude in favor or against named arguments Uniterm in
BLD,
> based on the discussion last week [1] and Michael's and Harold's
replies
> to Sandro's question about implementation [4]?
> 
> - Issue 40 (builtins and logic functions) [5], [9]
> 
> PROPOSED: BLD WD2 will include the builtins listed in [6] (functions
on
> numerics), [7] (functions on strings) and [8] (functions on dates and
> times)
> 
>   * How does RIF say about out-of-domain arguments? See email
discussion
> [4]
> 
> - Issue 45 (lists) [10], [11]
> 
> 6. AOB
> 
> - Pick scribe for next telecon
> 
> - Next meeting: 22 January 2008
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2008 08:51:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:44 GMT