W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > January 2008

Re: Responses to Peter F. Patel-Schneider's comments [was: [Admin] draft of RIF telecon minutes for 8 January 2008]

From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:08:09 -0500
To: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
Cc: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <30419.1199930889@cs.sunysb.edu>


> > ChrisW: Responses to Peter F. Patel-Schneider's comments on BLD and SWC 
> > are on the main page.
> > 
> > <ChrisW> http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Response_to_PPS1 
> > <http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Response_to_PPS2>
> > 
> > <ChrisW> http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Response_to_PPS2
> > 
> > ChrisW: I think the 1st response is finished.
> > ... people can have a few days to look at it and then, unless someone 
> > objects, we'll send that response later this week
> 
> 
> The responses look fine to me, with the exception that no answer is 
> given to the question "Why is a new treatment of data values needed?"; 
> the response merely includes a concise description of the relationship 
> between the two.
> I suggest that someone who knows the answer to this question writes it up.
> 
> 
> Best, Jos

The explanation was uniformity of the treatment. But since, it seems, this
was not clear, I made it more explicit in the answer.

I think both responses are finished. Did you want to do something for
Response_to_PPS2? 


	--michael  
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2008 02:08:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:44 GMT