W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > January 2008

Re: implementing named-argument uniterms (ISSUE-44)

From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:09:59 -0500
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <31086.1199898599@cs.sunysb.edu>


If the order of arguments is fixed, then it is easy. But the order of
arguments is not fixed in BLD, and this is cumbersome.


	--michael  

> How hard is it to translate from BLD with named-argument uniterms to BLD
> without them, or to various rule languages without them?  Is this
> basically syntactic sugar, or is it pretty hard?
> 
> If it's hard, I don't think it's appropriate to include named-argument
> uniterms in BLD, as much as I happen to personally like them.
> 
> Specifically, can someone provide a translation algorithm and example?
> 
>     -- Sandro
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2008 17:10:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:44 GMT