W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > December 2008

Re: Using OWL Functional Syntax in RIF test cases

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:13:57 -0500
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
cc: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <1737.1229098437@ubuhebe>

> On 12 Dec 2008, at 14:38, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> 
> > (re ACTION-673, closed)
> >
> > Yes, the (Manchester) OWL (Java) "API" (Toolkit)
> 
> Let it go, Sandro. Let it go.

Too late, I just got a tatoo about it.   It's quite elegant, really,
with all the thorns.

> > [1] is supposed to
> > parse the OWL 2 Functional Syntax (their presentation syntax).  We  
> > still
> > have the question of how we'll actually use this code -- who is  
> > writing
> > the test case manifest/processing code -- but there's probably no big
> > reason to disallow OWL Functional syntax in our test cases.
> 
> One can use the web service as well:
> 	http://owl.cs.manchester.ac.uk/converter/
> URI recipes:
> 	http://owl.cs.manchester.ac.uk/converter/restful.jsp

Thanks!

      - s
Received on Friday, 12 December 2008 16:14:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:00 GMT