W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > August 2008

Re: [RIF] language for test metadata

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:29:34 -0400
To: Stella Mitchell <cleo@us.ibm.com>
cc: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>, public-rif-wg-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <29195.1220207374@ubuhebe>


> And also, do we think we need to provide a machine-readable
> schema for the manifest files?

I'd think the default design would be just use the RDF and OWL test
ontologies and formats, with only justified changes.

     -- Sandro


> Stella Mitchell/Watson/IBM@IBMUS 
> Sent by: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org
> 08/31/2008 01:37 PM
> 
> To
> RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
> cc
> 
> Subject
> [RIF] language for test metadata
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> We need to decide what language to represent the test metadata in. 
> The only expressed opinions  so far have been to use RIF annotations, 
> so that seems like the default choice.  But we want to make sure we've 
> considered all the pros&cons.  Any thoughts? 
> 
> TCG

> --=_alternative 0064A688852574B6_=
> Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
> 
> 
> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">And also, do we think we need to provide
> a machine-readable</font>
> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">schema for the manifest files?</font>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <table width=100%>
> <tr valign=top>
> <td width=40%><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>Stella Mitchell/Watson/IBM@IB
> MUS</b>
> </font>
> <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org</fon
> t>
> <p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">08/31/2008 01:37 PM</font>
> <td width=59%>
> <table width=100%>
> <tr valign=top>
> <td>
> <div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">To</font></div>
> <td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">RIF WG &lt;public-rif-wg@w3.org&gt;</font>
> <tr valign=top>
> <td>
> <div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cc</font></div>
> <td>
> <tr valign=top>
> <td>
> <div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Subject</font></div>
> <td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">[RIF] language for test metadata</font></t
> able>
> <br>
> <table>
> <tr valign=top>
> <td>
> <td></table>
> <br></table>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br><font size=3><br>
> </font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
> We need to decide what language to represent the test metadata in.</font><fon
> t size=3>
> </font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
> The only expressed opinions &nbsp;so far have been to use RIF annotations,</f
> ont><font size=3>
> </font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
> so that seems like the default choice. &nbsp;But we want to make sure we've</
> font><font size=3>
> </font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
> considered all the pros&amp;cons. &nbsp;Any thoughts?</font><font size=3>
> <br>
> </font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
> TCG</font>
> <br>
> --=_alternative 0064A688852574B6_=--
Received on Sunday, 31 August 2008 18:31:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:53 GMT