W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > August 2008

Re: [DTB] summary of editorial issues (completes ACTION-552)

From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:26:37 +0100
Message-ID: <48B6613D.8070502@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
CC: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>, "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>

Axel Polleres wrote:
> 
> Jos de Bruijn wrote:
>>
>> Axel Polleres wrote:

[snip]

>>> If the group is fine with
>>>
>>> pred:XMLLiteral-not-equals("<a/>"^^rdf:XMLLiteral
>>>                            "<a />"^^rdf:XMLLiteral)
>>>
>>> then fair enough. As far as I understood, XML prescribes some
>>> normalization of end-of-lines
>>>
>>>  http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006#sec-line-ends
>>>
>>> and for white spaces in attribute values
>>>
>>>  http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006#AVNormalize
>>>
>>> Do we need to bother about this?
> 
> Any opinions about this?

Jos already dealt with this in:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Aug/0141.html

rdf:XMLLiteral values correspond to normalized (exclusive 
canonicalization) XML strings, including white space and line end 
normalization so there is no need for additional normalization in 
comparing such literals.

Dave
-- 
Hewlett-Packard Limited
Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Thursday, 28 August 2008 08:28:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:53 GMT