Michal, I added a note to the top of the RDF section, which hopefully clarifies how rules using RDF are envisioned to be exchanged. If there is still some unclarity, please let me know and I will update the text accordingly. Best, Jos Michael Kifer wrote: > Jos, > continuing the discussion that was started at the end of F2F, the RDF > compatibility document makes no sense unless it is preceded by a clear > explanation of how the exchange of rules that use RDF is supposed to happen. > > You mentioned two possibilities, where one requires the combined semantics > and the other the embedding. You have to spell them out clearly. > Without such a clear statement it is hard to tell which part of the rif-rdf > document is to be made normative. > > > --michael -- debruijn@inf.unibz.it Jos de Bruijn, http://www.debruijn.net/ ---------------------------------------------- In heaven all the interesting people are missing. - Friedrich Nietzsche
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:43 GMT