- From: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 23:42:23 -0400
- To: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Dave Reynolds wrote: > The items from my review that I wasn't completely sure of after the face > to face were: > > (a) The inclusion of slotted terms. We never did discuss why those are > still in there (even if they are "for free" :-)) This will be discussed at the telecon. > > (b) rif:subClassOf (##). I know we agreed to keep rif:type (#) for now > and we previously agreed to put ## in the draft with a framing > discussion but I'm not clear on whether we are still going to have that > framing discussion. > This will remain in the draft, but we have an action on MK to open an issue. We won't discuss it at the telecon. > (c) rif:text. I don't think there was any disagreement with it that > needs discussion, it will just be a thing to check before publication. We discussed at the f2f. Not sure what you mean. -Chris > > Dave -- Dr. Christopher A. Welty IBM Watson Research Center +1.914.784.7055 19 Skyline Dr. cawelty@gmail.com Hawthorne, NY 10532 http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2007 03:42:38 UTC