Dave Reynolds wrote: > The items from my review that I wasn't completely sure of after the face > to face were: > > (a) The inclusion of slotted terms. We never did discuss why those are > still in there (even if they are "for free" :-)) This will be discussed at the telecon. > > (b) rif:subClassOf (##). I know we agreed to keep rif:type (#) for now > and we previously agreed to put ## in the draft with a framing > discussion but I'm not clear on whether we are still going to have that > framing discussion. > This will remain in the draft, but we have an action on MK to open an issue. We won't discuss it at the telecon. > (c) rif:text. I don't think there was any disagreement with it that > needs discussion, it will just be a thing to check before publication. We discussed at the f2f. Not sure what you mean. -Chris > > Dave -- Dr. Christopher A. Welty IBM Watson Research Center +1.914.784.7055 19 Skyline Dr. cawelty@gmail.com Hawthorne, NY 10532 http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/weltyReceived on Thursday, 4 October 2007 03:42:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:43 GMT