W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > November 2007

Re: evaluable predicates, general definition

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 12:43:37 +0000
Message-ID: <473455F9.1030300@deri.org>
To: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
CC: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>

Michael Kifer wrote:
>> ???? I think we simply don't disagree. So, about exactly what are we 
>> arguing here? :-)
>> Axel
> Not sure :-)
> (I was not asking for a definition of builtin predicates. I think I did not.)

ok, but it seems we do agree that the definition of binding patterns 
might ins some form be useful/necessary to make builtins usable, yes?


Dr. Axel Polleres
email: axel@polleres.net  url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Friday, 9 November 2007 12:44:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:43 GMT