Adrian Giurca wrote: > > Do we need also 15 Functions and Operators on Sequences > <http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions/#sequence-functions>? At the moment I don't think we have a sequence or list type in the core and the way we choose to address that lack will affect which operators are appropriate. So I would argue for leaving section 15 out for now. Dave > -Adrian > Paula-Lavinia Patranjan wrote: >> Dave Reynolds wrote: >>> Excellent, thanks for doing this. >>> >>> For the string datatype I'd be inclined to also include the "string >>> match" and "pattern match" groups of functions as well. We certainly >>> use regex matching in our own work and it is in the subset used in >>> SPARQL. >> >> DONE :) >> >> (See >> http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/List_of_functions_and_operators) >> >> Regards, >> Paula > >Received on Tuesday, 29 May 2007 08:59:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:39 GMT