- From: Gary Hallmark <gary.hallmark@oracle.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 14:23:06 -0700
- To: public-rif-wg@w3.org
I haven't received many comments on my proposed simple rules to derive an XML schema.from the ASN06, the resulting schema, or the resulting instance document. (Harold, you may want to post the comments you sent to the group) I do not want to vote on each of a half dozen "coin flip" decisions on what the concrete xml syntax should look like. Instead, I want to see a simple set of rules or steps to derive the schema from the ASN06, the resulting schema to make sure it is usable for my JAXB implementation strategy, and at least one instance document to make sure it doesn't look too ugly. In particular, I will not support a "no stripe skipping" resolution in the absence of a complete solution. > > I recently updated the wiki page > > http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Arch/XML_Syntax > > under the section on Stripe Skipping. > > I suggest a couple of simple mechanical rules to translate from ASN06 > to XML Schema that provides some stripe skipping. > > > Sandro Hawke wrote: > >> In case we get to the XML Syntax discussion in the meeting, I've put >> together a list of "coin-flip" [1] decisions that have to be made >> here (8 >> of them as of this writing, although there are some subsidiary >> decisions). >> >> http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Arch/XML_Syntax >> >> My expectation is for this page to evolve in place, to have resolved >> details along with any remaining issues. >> >> Feel free to add attributed comments to the page (you'll see some from >> me -- they start with "SandroHawke") or reply to this e-mail. >> >> -- Sandro >> >> [1] What I mean by "coin-flip" decision is that I doubt there exist >> strong arguments on either side of these issues. It would be better to >> flip a coin than spend very much time on them. Still, a few hours is >> warranted. >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Monday, 28 May 2007 21:22:15 UTC