W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Metadata Strawman 1

From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 05:49:51 -0400
To: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8618.1178876991@cs.sunysb.edu>


> 
> kifer@cs.sunysb.edu (Michael Kifer) writes:
> > > and I think we've decided, in principle, to add
> > > 
> > >        subclass Triple
> > >           property subject: TERM
> > >           property property: TERM
> > >           property value: TERM
> > 
> > I don't believe we agreed to add a class triple. 
> 
> As I recall, we acknowledged that we needed to see it in writing, and
> you said you'd write it up.  What I understood was being proposed is the
> above (although I was hoping for some kind of hilog approach as well).

I don't remember this action item for me.

> > I think we were discussing
> > whether to use a hilog-style representation for rdf or a frame-based.
> > A triple representation was also mentioned, but not agreed upon.
> 
> How is this Triple approach different from Frame-based?  They seem the
> same to me.

All these approaches are "the same" at some level. The difference is the
syntax. In this particular case, whether we introduce a special class
or reuse the syntax for slotted formulas.


	--michael  

> 
>     -- Sandro
> 
Received on Friday, 11 May 2007 09:50:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:38 GMT