kifer@cs.sunysb.edu (Michael Kifer) writes: > > and I think we've decided, in principle, to add > > > > subclass Triple > > property subject: TERM > > property property: TERM > > property value: TERM > > I don't believe we agreed to add a class triple. As I recall, we acknowledged that we needed to see it in writing, and you said you'd write it up. What I understood was being proposed is the above (although I was hoping for some kind of hilog approach as well). > I think we were discussing > whether to use a hilog-style representation for rdf or a frame-based. > A triple representation was also mentioned, but not agreed upon. How is this Triple approach different from Frame-based? They seem the same to me. -- SandroReceived on Thursday, 10 May 2007 21:09:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:38 GMT