- From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:15:27 +0000
- To: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
- Cc: RIF <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Michael Kifer wrote: > Also, at the f2f we discussed that OWL uses RDF data, but strictly > separates individuals from concepts. OWL/DL does, OWL/full of course does not. We have a significant number of uses and users of OWL/full so requiring such separation could be a serious problem for us. [I don't think you were suggesting that but wanted to be on record on this.] Dave > Just wanted to point out that sorts can give us a way to do that also. > Simply require appropriate signatures for the subclassOf, memberOf > relationships, and also for the attributes of objects (i.e., rolesd). > > > --michael >
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2007 18:20:08 UTC