- From: Boley, Harold <Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:04:08 -0400
- To: "Dave Reynolds" <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>, <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
I know. Yet, developing/maintaining two schemas would be harder than developing/maintaining one, Harold -----Original Message----- From: Dave Reynolds [mailto:der@hplb.hpl.hp.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 11:59 AM To: Boley, Harold Cc: Sandro Hawke; public-rif-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: XML Syntax Strawman (ACTION-309) Boley, Harold wrote: >> Can you give me an example of how this might be so, other than support >> for xsi:type? (I'm still working on that one, and I'll grant that it >> might turn out to be compelling.) > > One example is that RDF/XML does not support perfect XSD validation > before first also fixing an RDF Schema. But surely Sandro's proposal does precisely that. The end result is something which happens to be well-formed RDF/XML but does not break schema validation. If we allowed open metadata that would break schema validation but, as I understand it, Sandro is proposing restricting that. See the discussion under (c) in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2007Jul/0067.html Dave -- Hewlett-Packard Limited Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2007 15:04:41 UTC