W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > January 2007

Re: RIF WG Minutes from 2 Jan. 2007 telecon

From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 06:25:56 +0000
Message-ID: <459C9DF4.7050504@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: "Nichols, Deborah L." <dlnichols@mitre.org>
CC: public-rif-wg@w3.org

Nichols, Deborah L. wrote:

> Dave Reynolds: When you said that Christian's statement regarding issue 
> 12 seemed to be stronger than what the Charter is committed to, was it 
> because it seems to imply that all dialects could be considered 
> standard SW rule languages?

Yes.

> Dave -- I see a confirmation dlof this in your email from this afternoon 
> and can draw upon that.

Fine.

> DaveReynolds: Would that include in syntactic elements things like 
> functions, operators, etc.?

I think that was (or was supposed to be :-)) "... syntactic elements and 
things like functions ...".

> Dave: Christian's statement 
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2006Dec/0135.html> on 
> issue 12 <http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/issues/12> is stronger 
> than Gerd understands the RIF Charter 

s/Gerd/he/ ?

Dave
Received on Thursday, 4 January 2007 06:26:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:35 GMT