Re: RIF WG Minutes from 2 Jan. 2007 telecon

Nichols, Deborah L. wrote:

> Dave Reynolds: When you said that Christian's statement regarding issue 
> 12 seemed to be stronger than what the Charter is committed to, was it 
> because it seems to imply that all dialects could be considered 
> standard SW rule languages?

Yes.

> Dave -- I see a confirmation dlof this in your email from this afternoon 
> and can draw upon that.

Fine.

> DaveReynolds: Would that include in syntactic elements things like 
> functions, operators, etc.?

I think that was (or was supposed to be :-)) "... syntactic elements and 
things like functions ...".

> Dave: Christian's statement 
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2006Dec/0135.html> on 
> issue 12 <http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/issues/12> is stronger 
> than Gerd understands the RIF Charter 

s/Gerd/he/ ?

Dave

Received on Thursday, 4 January 2007 06:26:20 UTC