On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 09:51 -0500, Sandro Hawke wrote: > > class Ruleset > property rule: Rule* > > class Rule > > subclass Forall > property clause : Clause > property declare : Var Why a * in Rule* but not in Clause* nor Var*? That seems inconsistent or backwards to me. Perhaps I don't understand the notation. > class Clause > > subclass Atom I look forward to an elaboration of Atom. Most of the issues I'm interested in are in there. > subclass Implies > property if: Condition > property then: Atom hmm... only one Atom in the 'then' part. That's weaker than SPARQL's CONSTRUCT, if I'm reading this correctly. That seems kinda odd. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Tuesday, 27 February 2007 15:16:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:37 GMT