- From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 09:18:41 +0000
- To: "Boley, Harold" <Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>
- Cc: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Hi Harold, > [NEW] ACTION: Harold to add placeholder sections each for OWL and RDF > compatibilty > [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/06-rif-minutes.html#action02] > > See new "RIF Compatibility" links in Table Of Contents: > > http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Core For the working draft itself presumably the links to A4, A5 and the two Wiki discussion pages would be missed out? The sections A4 and A5 suggest particular approaches which haven't been agreed and certainly shouldn't go in the WD. The Wiki pages give a fuller outline of the issues but I thought the resolution yesterday indicates that the outlines have not yet received enough attention from the WG to go in the WD either. Having those links in our internal document to remind us seems OK but I don't know how the formatting tool will treat them. Dave
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2007 09:18:49 UTC