Re: Reminder: pending discussion "membership" (pending discussion on ACTION-350)

> My simple inference from this discussion that perhaps BLD should be
> BLCore (no "schema features") and BLDialect (BLCore + "schema
> features")? 

Yes, we discussed already that BLD is something like OWL Full--.
That is, it is definitely not a core. The core will be a profile of the
BLD, which we are yet to define.


	--michael