W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > September 2006

Issue #4

From: Francis McCabe <frankmccabe@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:43:34 -0700
Message-Id: <772F1A68-79F8-440F-BEB8-534B231A82C2@mac.com>
To: W3C RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>

This comment was added to the issue tracker regarding issue #4:

-----

There was some discussion about this issue which I was not party to.

However, the reason that a compliance model supports interoperability  
is that a formal understanding of what it means to comply to the RIF  
is *essential* to the succesful use of RIF, and hence to  
interoperability. The alternative to a formal compliance model is an  
informal one: i.e., that defined by what popular tools support.

The requirement was dropped, but I believe erroneously.

-----

Frank
Received on Monday, 25 September 2006 02:43:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:33 GMT