Re: [TEST] simple SPARQL condition and SNAF condition

Since I suspect many of us don't know sparql, Jos, can you explain what 
this means and why you posted it to RIF?

-Chris

jos.deroo@agfa.com wrote:
> In writing Prolog I make a lot of use of findall
> and in N3 I found it useful as
>
> e:findall
>   rdfs:comment
> """?SCOPE e:findall (?SELECT ?WHERE ?ANSWER).
> unifies ?ANSWER with a list that contains all the
> instantiations of ?SELECT satisfying the ?WHERE
> clause in the ?SCOPE of all asserted n3 formulae
> and their log:conclusion""";
>   a rdf:Property;
>   rdfs:domain log:Formula;
>   rdfs:range rdf:List.
>
> I mean useful for 2 reasons
> 1/ it is a way to have a simple SPARQL condition
> 2/ it is a way to have a SNAF condition when used as
>    ?SCOPE e:findall (?SELECT ?WHERE rdf:nil).
>
> There is a test case result at
> http://eulersharp.sourceforge.net/2006/02swap/medicE.n3
>
>   


-- 
Dr. Christopher A. Welty                    IBM Watson Research Center
+1.914.784.7055                             19 Skyline Dr.
cawelty@frontiernet.net                     Hawthorne, NY 10532
http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty