- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:16:33 -0500
- To: "Boley, Harold" <Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>
- Cc: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 11:01 -0400, Boley, Harold wrote: > Dave Reynolds wrote: > > > > Dave, I suggest that <Ind> is what you're after if you want to > > > use URIs for names. > > > > Well Inds aren't defined on that page but I can guess what they are > :-) > > A CORE+ version with <Con> differentiated into webized <Ind> and <Data> > is in the wiki's versioning system (see the XML syntax box): > http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/A.1_Basis%3A_Positive_Conditions?ac > tion=recall&rev=5 Oops; I guess I was confused... <Ind> is not in the current proposal? In that case, I don't support the current proposal. I need <Ind>. > This can also be seen as an initially refined version of the current > CORE: > http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/A.1.1_Basis%3A_Positive_Conditions_ > over_Bipartitioned_Constants > > -- Harold -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 16 October 2006 15:16:49 UTC