Re: resolutions

How about Rule Ontology?

On Nov 11, 2006, at 9:56 AM, Dave Reynolds wrote:

>
> Sandro Hawke wrote:
>> Chris posted the resultions to the wiki:
>>   http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/F2F4
>> (posted for him, since his e-mail isn't working.)
>
> Whilst not a resolution, another outcome of the meeting for me was  
> the realization/suggestion that RIF needs a library of components  
> that can be reused across dialects. This would include:
>
>   - syntax components
>     (within the extensible syntax framework)
>
>   - metadata vocabulary elements
>     (including the compatibility categories, and native<->RIF mapping
>      metadata)
>
>   - selected datatypes
>     (we have already selected XSD but haven't spelled out the
>      precise subset to be supported)
>
>   - associated datatype functions
>     (presumably drawn from XQuery functions and operators)
>
> Since the terminology "core" has already been taken we need a name  
> for this "shared RIF stuff". RIFLib? RIF Vocabulary?
>
> Dave
>
>