- From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 10:04:34 +0000
- To: "Vincent, Paul D" <PaulVincent@fairisaac.com>
- CC: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Vincent, Paul D wrote: > I may be a little off base here, but: design-time model interchange from say OWL to a (production) rules engine, where the (vocabulary) "rules" would map to the object (/data) model the rules engine works with, could in theory be covered by the ODM --> class diagram + PRR mapping using MDA. The OWL model is not an object model. Yes ODM would enable to encode a representation of an OWL ontology in the same format as you could encode a UML object model but I don't believe it will handle any of the semantic mismatches for you. [That way of explaining the requirement sounds rather different from the way Michael described it, so I'm even less sure I understand what is being talked about now. Sorry.] Dave
Received on Friday, 3 March 2006 10:04:52 UTC