RE: [SWC] RIF & OWL compatibility

> > Not allowing to express classification statements for
> > data literals (but instead imposing the corresponding
> > statement for a blank node) is clearly an anomaly of
> > the current RDF semantics
> 
> Partly agree, but it *is* part of the standard.
> 
> > and can't hardly be the basis for any requirement on RIF.
> 
> Well, you have to consider that RIF has to comply to the W3C  
> standards, being itself a W3C standard, right?

Well, complying with a feature, which is not really a 
feature but rather a bug, would be stupid, wouldn't it? 

-Gerd