W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > January 2006

RE: [SWC] RIF & OWL compatibility

From: Gerd Wagner <wagnerg@tu-cottbus.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:27:51 +0100
To: "'Enrico Franconi'" <franconi@inf.unibz.it>, "'W3C RIF WG'" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <003601c61ac2$30b84c80$55032b8d@TMGWAGNER>

> > Not allowing to express classification statements for
> > data literals (but instead imposing the corresponding
> > statement for a blank node) is clearly an anomaly of
> > the current RDF semantics
> Partly agree, but it *is* part of the standard.
> > and can't hardly be the basis for any requirement on RIF.
> Well, you have to consider that RIF has to comply to the W3C  
> standards, being itself a W3C standard, right?

Well, complying with a feature, which is not really a 
feature but rather a bug, would be stupid, wouldn't it? 

Received on Monday, 16 January 2006 17:30:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:26 GMT