[UCR] Use Case Comments

I ask just 2 questions of each use case:

1. is it obvious that rules are being exchanged?

2. is at least one rule written down?

A "no" to Q1 results in a "not approved" for the use case.  A "no" to 
Q2  requires editing.   The edits for Q2 should be coordinated so that 
all written examples of rules look similar (although of course we 
haven't specified that yet).

Use Case            Q1: RIF?   Q2: Rule?
Info Integration    no         no        
Decision Support    no         no
Cross-Platform...   yes        yes
Policy-based...     yes        yes
Human-oriented...   yes        no   
Publication         yes        yes   (note: "FOAF" used but not defined)
Third Party...      yes        yes
Rich KR             yes        yes

 
             

Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2006 01:55:12 UTC