Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited)

At 09:09 AM 2/8/2006 -0500, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:



> > Why? We do not need a rule language that covers any possible feature 
> but one
> > that covers 80% of the stuff that is used and useful.
>
>Hmm.  A RIF that covers 80% of what is used and useful might actually be
>totally useless, as almost every rule-set might include something that the RIF
>doesn't handle.


So what? You may loose something that is not very common.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Dieter Fensel, http://www.deri.org/
Tel.: +43-512-5076485/8
Skype: dieterfensel