Re: [UCR] comment on reference to charter definition of "rule language"

Ginsberg, Allen wrote:

>Anyway, I am of 2 minds myself with regard to the question of whether
>or not the RIF is a rule language.  
>
Likely, it is desirable not to commit ourselves to produce a fully
defined processable reasoning language. But beware of saying aoround, we
do not define a "rule language".  Nobody would understand!
-- 
Francois

Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2006 15:05:53 UTC