RE: RIF liason to Web Services Choreography?

IMHO: RIF and WE-Choreography are orthogonal (RIF could be a payload between choreographed web services).
For rules that assist with choreography decisions (eg load balancing, QOS, content-based routing etc) there is no (special) interchange requirement.

Paul Vincent
Fair Isaac Blaze Advisor --- Business Rule Management
OMG Standards for Business Rules, PRR & BPMI
mobile: +44 (0)781 493 7229 ... office: +44 (0)20 7871 7229 
-----Original Message-----
From: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sandro Hawke
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 2:40 PM
To: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Subject: RIF liason to Web Services Choreography?



Do we have any RIF folks who are involved with or care about Web
Services Choreography?  The WS Choreography Working Group [1] [2] sent
out this request for assistance...

     The WG would like to provide a section or two in the primer that
     specifically deals with RDF and OWL technologies for adding
     semantics to a CDL description. Our problem is we simply do not
     have the resources and skills to do it. 

         -- Steve Ross-Talbot, co-chair W3C Choreography WG [3]

and I thought we might have someone with the relevant expertise and
interest.  In particular, the "RDF and OWL" reference might well
logically be updated to include RIF -- I think it's really about W3C
semantic technologies (where there's an empty spot on the shelf, waiting
for RIF).

You can reply directly to Steve, or I'd be happy to help coordinate.
This could probably be done as WG-WG liason, or less formally, depending
on what kind of technical issues end up being involved.

      -- sandro

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/chor/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=34340
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2006Jan/0001.html

Received on Friday, 3 February 2006 14:44:32 UTC