> Christian: if the definition of a dialect is something that extends the > core then RIF Core <> RIF dialect. > > If on the other hand RIF Core is just another name for RIF Horn, then it > is a dialect. After this debate, I wonder if we should set aside the notions of "core", "dialects", and other packages of features for now and just consider specific features for a while. Maybe Phase 1 really can be just 10-20 standard features which implementors can mix and match, without packaging. In any case, maybe it makes sense to consider packaging separately from the features/components which are being packaged into dialects (including core). -- SandroReceived on Tuesday, 19 December 2006 14:27:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:34 GMT