Re: types of conformance

edbark@nist.gov wrote:
> 
> In the interest of delivering a useable specification in finite time, I 
> suggest that the RIFWG use its knowledge of mappings to condition the choices 
> for capabilities, syntax and semantics of the RIF subset languages, and stop 
> there.  The rest of the mapping technology issues will beget many academic 
> degrees and make certain toolsmiths richer than others, and that is as it 
> should be.

Ed,
Can you elaborate? What exactly are you proposing for RIFWG to do?


	--michael