W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > December 2006

Re: W3C RIF: "recursive rules" vs "recursive terms"

From: Gary Hallmark <GARY.HALLMARK@ORACLE.COM>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 00:11:15 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <5353647.1166512275999.JavaMail.oracle@rcsmt240.oracle.com>
To: Francis McCabe <frankmccabe@sandsoft.com>
Cc: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Are you speaking of disjunction in the head or body?  I agree that I don't know how to map disjunction in the head to an action that asserts one fact or another.  In the body, though, I think it's do-able.

if A or B then C 

transforms to

if A then C
if B and not A then C

Cheers,
   Gary


attached mail follows:


Received on Tuesday, 19 December 2006 07:11:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:34 GMT