Re: [TED] Action-188, ISSUE: production rule systems have "difficulty" with recursive rules in RIF Core

> Yes, but the purpose of the RIF is to support the interchange of any  
> rule language. Conformance must be expressed in terms of being  
> faithful to the semantics of RIF, not whether you implement  
> everything in it. If you are faithful to the semantics, then someone  
> else can come along and reliably interpret your translated rule set.

How do you suggest that I -- a user -- know what rules I can write and
remain confident they will work on several other vendors' systems?

     -- Sandro