W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > April 2006

Re: [UCR] Design constraints: early example goal/csf hierarchy --> PR / PRR

From: Chris Welty <cawelty@frontiernet.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 20:18:30 -0400
Message-ID: <444EBC56.3040206@frontiernet.net>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
CC: "Vincent, Paul D" <PaulVincent@fairisaac.com>, RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org> 

Bijan Parsia wrote:
>>  But it is unlikely that RIF-PR will be very different from the PRR 
>> standard (almost by definition).
>
> Interesting. Sorry to be pestery, but is there much more than the W3C 
> stamp to add? (Which is *fine* by me. I like easy wins. Actually, I 
> adore easy wins!)

Probably not much more.   But the important thing to many rule vendors 
will be to ensure that the "PR extension/fragment/whatever" that 
corresponds to PRR is compatible with the rest of RIF.

-Chris

-- 
Dr. Christopher A. Welty                    IBM Watson Research Center
+1.914.784.7055                             19 Skyline Dr.
cawelty@frontiernet.net                     Hawthorne, NY 10532
http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty
Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2006 00:18:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:28 GMT