Re: [UCR] Design constraints: early example goal/csf hierarchy --> PR / PRR

Christian de Sainte Marie wrote:
> [...]
> (iii) means that RIF must provide either a standard behaviour for the 
> case when a consumer finds, in a RIF document, a feature that its 
> application cannot process, or a standard way to describe the expected 
> behaviour, or both.
> 
> I proposed a requirement to that effect [1] (actually, (ii) extends that 
> requirement).

I meant that the requirement (iii), not (ii), above extended the 
requirement I submitted on the wiki page (to non-standard RIF document).

Christian