W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > December 2005

Re: [all] OWL and RDF compatibility scribles

From: <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:41:03 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200512151741.MAA20640@clue.mel.nist.gov>
To: kifer@cs.sunysb.edu, bparsia@isr.umd.edu
Cc: ewallace@cme.nist.gov, public-rif-wg@w3.org


Bijan wrote:
>On Dec 12, 2005, at 7:29 PM, Michael Kifer wrote:
>[snip]
>> There was a discussion of whether the query language (SPARQL) has 
>> negation
>> and Bijan said that the existentials get us there.
>> This is something that I don't understand. *Universal quantification* 
>> in a
>> query language introduces negation. But existential conjunctive queries
>> without explicit negation are Horn clauses and are within Datalog.
>> For those queries the classical equivalence of logical implication, 
>> least
>> fixpoint, and the unique min model holds.
>>
>> Bijan, please elaborate.
>
>I'm trying to reconstruct what I was thinking...
>
>Hmm.
>
>I think it was a brain fart. That or I was conflating the difficulties 
>you get with RDF and OWL kbs.

...or that it was just mis-scribed.  Others who were present for that 
session should look over what I wrote for mistakes or omissions.

-Evan
Received on Thursday, 15 December 2005 17:41:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:25 GMT