W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-comments@w3.org > April 2010

RE: [Fwd: RE: one more affirmation....]

From: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:20:53 +0200
Message-ID: <0EF30CAA69519C4CB91D01481AEA06A001CAD4B3@judith.fzi.de>
To: <public-rif-comments@w3.org>
Cc: "Jos de Bruijn" <bruijn@kr.tuwien.ac.at>, "Ian Horrocks" <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, "Chris Welty" <cawelty@gmail.com>
Hi!

After having checked again today, I can confirm that all the issues that I
have reported (see below) have been addressed adequately. 

I am satisfied with the result.

Best,
Michael

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Chris Welty [mailto:cawelty@gmail.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:18 PM
>To: Michael Schneider
>Cc: Jos de Bruijn; Ian Horrocks
>Subject: Re: [Fwd: RE: one more affirmation....]
>
>
>Michael,
>
>Could you respond to this message and let us know whether you are
>satisified with the result.
>
>Thanks,
>Chris
>
>Jos de Bruijn wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> Thanks very much for the typo hunting. In fact, using a similar search
>I was
>> able to find even more typos myself.
>>
>> Cheers, Jos
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jos!
>>>
>>> I just checked myself, looking for all occurrences of "OWL" (because
>this
>>> is
>>> often, though not always, a prefix to the terms in question), and
>then
>>> again
>>> for the terms separately, to be safe.
>>>
>>> I still found a few things:
>>>
>>> * §4, 2nd par: "Direct Demantics" (typo: "D")
>>>
>>> * §4, 3rd par: "combinations of RIF with OWL 2 DL are based on the
>OWL 2
>>> Structural Model"
>>>  (2 times "Structural Model" in this par).
>>>  I'm not sure what is meant by "Structural Model" here.
>>>  If it is meant in an informative way, then both "structural" and
>"model"
>>> should
>>>  probably be written lower-cased. I can see the formulation being
>used
>>> again repeatedly
>>>  in the beginning of 9.2.2, but there lower-cased. In any case, there
>is no
>>> such term
>>>  in the OWL 2 nomenclature. Maybe "Structural Specification" is
>meant?
>>>
>>> * 9.2.2.2, Proof of the "Normalized Combination Embedding Lemma":
>>>  "OWL2" instead of "OWL 2" (missing whitespace)
>>>
>>> * same proof, paragraph starting by "Consider a has-key axiom d."
>>>  there is a parenthetical reference to "OWL2-Semantics" without
>surrounding
>>> brackets.
>>>
>>> So, this should really be enough typo hunting from my side. ;-)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> From: jos.debruijn@gmail.com [mailto:jos.debruijn@gmail.com] On
>Behalf Of
>>> Jos de Bruijn
>>> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 10:50 PM
>>> To: Michael Schneider
>>> Cc: Ian Horrocks; Chris Welty
>>> Subject: Re: [Fwd: RE: one more affirmation....]
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thanks for bringing this issue to our attention. I think I now got
>all the
>>> lower-case versions of the terms.
>>>
>>> Cheers, Jos

--
Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider
Research Scientist, Information Process Engineering (IPE)
Tel  : +49-721-9654-726
Fax  : +49-721-9654-727
Email: michael.schneider@fzi.de
WWW  : http://www.fzi.de/michael.schneider
=======================================================================
FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe
Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe
Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959
Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts, Az 14-0563.1, RP Karlsruhe
Vorstand: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Rüdiger Dillmann, Dipl. Wi.-Ing. Michael Flor,
Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Wolffried Stucky, Prof. Dr. Rudi Studer
Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus
=======================================================================
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2010 06:21:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 15 April 2010 06:21:29 GMT