W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-comments@w3.org > April 2010

Re: RDF representation for RIF

From: Paul Gearon <gearon@ieee.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:01:34 -0400
Message-ID: <r2ja25ac1f1004131101v391466e9g8695615179eed2af@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: public-rif-comments@w3.org
Hi Sandro,


On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
<snip/>
> Sorry for the long delay before replying.  I've been working on a
> document, to be published as a Working Group Note, which specifies such
> a mapping.  You can see a current partial draft of the document here:
>
>   http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/RIF_In_RDF
>
> That draft documents my first version of a mapping, which I no longer
> think is quite right: it does not preserve presentation order, and it
> has the unfortunate property that subgraphs of a graph storing a
> representation of a RIF document will sometimes also convey different
> RIF documents.  Both of these issues are addressed in a new version I'm
> designing which uses rdf:Lists in more places.  When the document is
> ready, I'll let you know and ask for your review.
>
> Knowing that this work is underway, are you now satisfied that the
> concerns about RIF expressed in your comments have been addressed?
> Procedurally, it would be helpful to have an answer from each of you
> now, as we're preparing to advance to Proposed Recommendation.

I am happy with this work, so long as the issues you mention here are
addressed in future.

Not being familiar with everything in RIF, I'd like to ask if this
proposal is going to cover all of RIF, or just that portion that is
considered relevant to RDF?

Regards,
Paul Gearon
Received on Tuesday, 13 April 2010 18:02:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 13 April 2010 18:02:12 GMT