W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-comments@w3.org > December 2009

Re: RIF Implementation Report

From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:21:42 +0100
Message-ID: <4B18F0C6.8020604@inf.unibz.it>
To: Adrian Marte <adrian.marte@sti2.at>
CC: public-rif-comments@w3.org
Dear Adrian,

Thank you very much for your implementation report. We appreciate the
feedback.

We have two further questions concerning your implementation:
- will you support the datatypes and built-ins defined by RIF-DTB [1],
and to what extent? In other words, which datatypes and built-ins does
your implementation support?
- have you performed any of the test in the RIF Test Cases suite [2]? If
so, could you send us a report of the test results [3]?

Thanks.


Best, Jos


[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-dtb/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Test
[3] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Test#Reporting_Test_Results

Adrian Marte wrote:
> Dear RIF working group,
> 
> I am just writing to inform you that we are developing an open-source
> RIF-BLD Java implementation and hope to release a first version of our
> software at the end of this year. We will publish the code with a
> liberal open-source license and we would like to be added to the list of
> implementations on the RIF wiki.
> 
> The software will be delivered in two components:
> 
> 1. RIF/XML parser/serialiser - that translates RIF XML documents to a
> Java object model (that can be programmatically modified) and a
> serialiser that converts back to RIF/XML format.
> 
> 2. Reasoner components - this translates the Java object model to
> another representation suitable for the reasoner (the reasoner
> components used are from the IRIS set of reasoning components).
> 
> To answer the points requested on the submissions wiki page:
> 
> 1. Adrian Marte, STI Innsbruck (www.sti2.at <http://www.sti2.at>) and
> others (Barry Bishop, Christoph Fuchs, Matthias Pressnig, Daniel Winkler)
> 
> 2. The two components are the parser/serialiser/object model called
> "RIF4J" and the reasoner, which  will consist of enhancements to
> existing software components (WSMO4J, IRIS, WSML2Reasoner) which can
> simply be called "IRIS". For a one sentence description: "Parsing and
> translation code on top of the IRIS rule-engine". The software will both
> consume and produce RIF rule sets.
> 
> 3. We will support RIF-BLD - which matches with our existing Datalog
> rule-engine, although we have extended this with new data-types and
> built-ins..
> 
> 4. We plan to make this implementation conformant.
> 
> 5. RIF RDF and OWL compatibility has not been addressed yet.
> 
> 6. We implement some at-risk features, including "equality in rule
> conclusion".
> 
> 7. We would encourage early standardisation on RIF. The most confusing
> aspect to RIF so far has been the XML syntax and its inconsistent use of
> XML element names, both in terms of upper/lower case and abbreviations.
> 
> Regards,
> Adrian Marte
Received on Friday, 4 December 2009 11:22:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 4 December 2009 11:22:24 GMT