W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-comments@w3.org > August 2009

Re: Feature at risk #2 Equality in RIF-BLD

From: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:29:43 -0400
Message-ID: <4A97DBC7.5050707@gmail.com>
To: David Mott <MOTTD@uk.ibm.com>
CC: public-rif-comments@w3.org
HI David,

Thanks for the comment. Note that the feature is present because of its clear 
usefulness in rules, which you note. It is *at-risk* due to its perceived 
difficulty to implement in rule engines. We await implementor feedback on that 

Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:public-rif-comments@w3.org> 
(replying to this email should suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us 
know whether or not you are satisfied with the working group's response to your 

David Mott wrote:
 > I believe that the use of equality in the conclusion of a rule implication 
 > be retained, since there are situations where as a result of reasoning once 
 > to infer that 2 entities are in fact the same.
Received on Friday, 28 August 2009 13:30:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:49:19 UTC