On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 14:29 +0200, Jos de Bruijn wrote: [...] > does this address your concern? Yes. Some of it seems a little counter-intuitive, but it works, I suppose. > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-comments/2008May/0000.html > [2] > http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/SWC#Symbols_in_RIF_Versus_RDF.2FOWL_.28Informative.29 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Monday, 9 June 2008 17:04:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 9 June 2008 17:04:33 GMT