W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-comments@w3.org > July 2008

Re: I18N issues an OWL2

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:39:50 +0100
Message-ID: <4875D8E6.1010001@deri.org>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
CC: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@amazon.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Jie Bao <baojie@cs.rpi.edu>, "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>, "public-i18n-core-comments@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, public-rif-comments@w3.org, public-webont-comments@w3.org

Bijan Parsia wrote:
> (too many lists! :))
> I'd like to raise a point that Dan Brickley (cced) often champions. If 
> it's more appropriate in a narrower scope, please narrow it for me!
> In some applications, like FOAF, it's common to compare as equal two 
> strings with different language tags (esp. for such purposes as being a 
> database key like identifier). I can think of several ways to do this 
> (e.g., always comparing the strings and opting in to distinguishing the 
> languages), but I thought I'd raise the issue.
> Cheers,
> Bijan.

Well, with the built-in functions in DTB [1]... you should be able to do 
so, there are functions for extracting the string: by casting rif:text 
to xs:string [2]) as well as extracting the lang-tag (by adopting 
SPARQL's lang function [3]. Note that the former would be even easier 
with the langtag-as-dataype proposal, and for the latter, we'd need a 
function which returns the datatype of a literal... we have to discuss 
this, since sparql's datatype function [4] is not straightforwardly 
applicable to RIF semantically... at least there are some implications 
in defining it, I guess.



Dr. Axel Polleres, Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI)
email: axel.polleres@deri.org  url: http://www.polleres.net/

Everything is possible:
rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:Resource.
rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:subPropertyOf.
rdf:type rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:subClassOf.
rdfs:subClassOf rdf:type owl:SymmetricProperty.
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2008 09:40:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:49:19 UTC