W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-comments@w3.org > July 2008

RE: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString

From: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:11:02 +0200
Message-ID: <0EF30CAA69519C4CB91D01481AEA06A0A264A6@judith.fzi.de>
To: "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: <public-rif-comments@w3.org>, <public-owl-wg@w3.org>, "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>, "Axel Polleres" <axel.polleres@deri.org>, "Jie Bao" <baojie@cs.rpi.edu>
>On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:


>> Another alternative is to define a completely separate namespace for
>> extra RDF stuffs, but I am not sure that is nice...

What about "rdfx:"? (Analog to "javax".) This namespace would still be under
the control of the W3C, but would allow different working groups to put
stuff there, if it conceptually matches RDF(S)... or if these working groups
simply cannot settle on a winner. ;-) I assume that all three parties (OWL,
RIF, and RDF people) could pretty well live with this solution.

Now that I think about this idea, I wonder if it would have been a better
idea to put RDF reification and collections under such an "rdfx" namespace,


Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:11:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:49:19 UTC