Re: W3C HTML Fork without Digital Restriction Management

Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> wrote:

> Since EME is proposed to be a separate "Extension specification",
> isn't what you are looking for just the existing HTML5 and HTML5.1
> specifications ?

Something along those lines, yes... endorsing them and explicitly
requiring not to use EME... with openness for unproblematic future
extensions.

This is not as trivial as it might seem at first glance, due to the
need to formulate proper, precise conformance clauses etc, and
informative text explaining the rationale.

But still the modularity of W3C's approach is making this much, much
easier than it would otherwise be.

Greetings,
Norbert

Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2014 17:54:01 UTC