- From: Duncan Bayne <dhgbayne@fastmail.fm>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:43:33 -0800
- To: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014, at 04:38 PM, Mark Watson wrote: > Who is that question to ? I certainly have no idea of the answer to that > except that watermaking alone doesn't mean the requirements of any of our > existing content licenses. ... which was sort of my point. Discussion of watermarking etc. is missing the *underlying* cause of the friction, which is that (as I understand it) those licenses positively *require* non-user-modifiable client components. Actually, that's an assumption on my part. Is it possible for you to post the relevant sections of the content licenses to the list? It doesn't make sense to discuss potential solutions to requirements if those requirements aren't clear. -- Duncan Bayne ph: +61 420817082 | web: http://duncan-bayne.github.com/ | skype: duncan_bayne I usually check my mail every 24 - 48 hours. If there's something urgent going on, please send me an SMS or call me.
Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2014 00:43:55 UTC